Challenge courtesy of Boss: Good camera for a beginning photographer?
I currently have a Kodak V1003- great camera for the casual photographer of special occasions or sightseeing… substandard for anyone with serious interest in photography. With 10 MP, it’s an enormous improvement over the 3 MP cameras of a few years ago. It still falls far short of meeting my needs though.
I’m a novice, amateur photographer and focus mostly on animals. I need a camera with little to no delay between the time I take the picture and the time the camera actually captures the image. This is my primary concern. Of course I want exceptional image quality and camera versatility as well.
Can anyone with significant photography experience suggest a decent digital camera for an amateur photographer? Price plays a role, but will not necessarily be the deciding factor.
Thank you in advance for your input.
This is certainly exactly about Good camera for a beginning photographer? that you could really have to solve complications individually. Optimistically this will assist in lots of ways; in order to make yourself considerably better. Dreaming exactly about Good camera for a beginning photographer? might be a simple solution to come back.
Solution:
Answer by Shadow’s Melon
Now here’s another language I can talk 
Love my photography!
I have a Canon 20D, which is a “Digital Single Lens Reflex” camera. DSLRs function just like a real 35mm camera with manual over ride for creative adjustments in shutter speed, f-stops and ISO settings.
For what you are doing, I wouldn’t settle for anything less than a DSLR. In Canon, you can get a step down from what I have in the Rebel XT models, which still rins in the vacintiy of $ 800-$ 1000 in cost, but still less than the D series and nearly the same. You only lose a few minor features with the Rebel series over the D series.
Okay, now I talked Canons cuz that’s what I have, but do research your options with Nikon as well as a couple other brands to find what you want and what might cater to your price range better.
Good luck finding the new camera! I love having my DSLR and can’t imagine going back to a consumer level digital again
Answer by mevadus
I personally would go with the pentax k1000. There is a lot you can do with a slr that you can’t do with a digital. Digital will not help make you a better photographer. You need to learn to use a camera, process your own film, and make your own prints.
Answer by koehlerdogtraining ©
You need a Digital SLR.
Try the Canon “Rebel.” It is relatively inexpensive and the lenses are interchangeable for when you decide to upgrade the body.
Tony A-
Answer by Bill P
I can’t seem to understand why everyone who asks a question like this is told to spend what will soon equate to $ 1000-2000 when he does not need that much.
The recommendation for the K1000 Pentax is an excellent suggestion and the writer of that is correct when he states that you can do a lot more with film than you can with digital. Film cameras are no where near as complex, no where near as expensive to purchase, and the prints are less expensive than you would get with a digital, printing them in your home.
The K1000 is a very versatile camera for which you can get a variety of lenses that you might want, 35mm, 50mm, and, perhaps, a 135 or a longer zoom (70-205(210)mm for very little money.
Digital cameras literally cost too much for a beginner and literally teach him nothing about photography. All of the DSLRs have so many buttons on them that it takes an electrical engineer to figure them out. Another bad aspect of digital is that as soon as you buy the latest thing out, a new product will replace it and your camera will be out of date. It is very difficult for a K1000 to go out of date and film will be around for a long time.
As long as digitals are in megapixels, you will have trouble enlarging them, regardless of how many mps you have.
The cost of prints is a good bit cheaper on a film camera and you can have your prints within a hour from places like Target, Wal-Mart or anyother store that provides you with 1 hour photo. I use Target to print my color 35mm pictures and generally pay less than $ 8 per roll of 24. If you don’t like the pictures, they will not charge you for them, so it can be less. Digital is a long way from equalling the quality of film which has no megapixel count.
Answer by catinthehat99
DSLR is the way to go, and it is more cost effective. The Nikon D40 is 10 MP and cost is around $ 500. But that is all you need to buy. You can work your prints on your PC/Mac. You should get a photo editor like Photoshop Elements (Version 6 is now on the shelf for under $ 90). You can take as many shots as you like without buying film or prints. A DSLR will not make you better, but the experience you get from a DSLR will make you better faster and cheaper than a film SLR in the long run. And you do not have to process your own film, that is rubbish. But it is a fun process to learn, kinda like baking bread, you don’t have to do it, but there is nothing wrong with doing it.
Answer by ALT
I really love the suggestion of a pentax K1000. Why did he get so many thumbs down?
A film SLR lets you mess with lighting, exposure, and a lot of other effects that you can’t get with a digital camera. I started out on one and have learned a lot. In fact, when I switched to automatic and then to digital, I became lazy with the features since everything was automatic. You won’t be able to see the picture until after you develop the film, but you will be happy with the results. You will learn things that you would have never thought of.
The frame is very tough and hard to damage. Mine has been through everything and is still in great condition. You can take quick shots if the lighting stays the same and the meter is very easy to read.
Now, for digital cameras, I suggest a Canon Powershot S3 IS. I have been using one for a while now and really enjoy it. You can find it at a decent price (about $ 300) and can do some of the things that a regular SLR camera will do. You can take a look at my photos to see the quality:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/22131398@N05/
I would still drop the digital cameras and focus on a manual one until you get the hang of it. It will help you improve a lot.
Answer by DeDave
I see you are getting some good suggestions on inexpensive film and digital cameras. Film cameras force you to understand the principles of photography; which are very important as a photographer. This knowledge will enhance your experience with a digital camera. If you feel that you have the discipline to learn and understand the principle, then I would suggest a digital SLR.
The main problem with digital technology is that it can make you lazy, if you let it. Lazy in that you can correct/manipulate the image with editing software. By doing this you loose the skills that are required to be a great photographer.
A motto I like from a photography club that I belong is: “Take it, don’t make it”.
Figure out far better?
Leave your personal answer inside the comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment