Request by Mozart: are there unfinished books of the bible?
i heard somewhere that there were unfinished books of the bible that are being held in europe somewhere. is that true? and if so why dont they just put them in the bible the way it is?
This is now needed to know about are there unfinished books of the bible? that you could should certainly solve difficulties for their own reasons. With any luck , this’ll help in several ways; and formulate the way you live better. Praying needed to know about are there unfinished books of the bible? may perhaps be a method at a later date.
Best answer:
Answer by Silent-H
Because they say things that Christians wouldn’t like very much…
Answer by Fireball
no dont buy into the hype…IT WAS FINISHED THOUS OF YRS ago..
Answer by Pete
No. The Bible is Jesus story and it is complete. Jesus Is The Messiah.
Answer by Rhage’s Rhevenge
The whole buybull is unfinished. They forgot to include that last line, “Just kidding!”
Answer by † Gabriel †
There are false gospels and heretical documents that people tried to add to the Bible, and failed. The 66 books of the Bible completes it perfectly. No need to add or take away anything.
Answer by TrippleFaceted
No such books exist. In fact when one considers what the Bible actually is and how it came about, one learns that it is not possible for there to be extra books of the Bible still out there. However, some of the books in the current BIble canon appear to be unfinished by the original authors.
While the latest in textual discoveries have uncovered manuscripts from Jews and Christians that parallel in thought much of what is found in the Bible, it must be understood that the Bible was never intended to be a “planned out” book, as if it had to be composed of certain texts and as if some of these were never found.
The word “Bible” means “library,” and this is an appropriate name for the book for it is really a collection of writings revered as inspired revelation from God by Jews and Christians. Just as a library of books does not need to have a certain book in it to be considered a library, there are no inspired instructions or restrictions in any book of the Bible that either Jews or Christians followed to develop the Bible that we now have.
The books which are found in the Old Testament and the New Testament make up what is called a “canon” or “official listing of recognized books.” Both canons of the Old Testament were decided upon by religious leaders centuries ago, and both canons have since been closed.
This means that the list of books that were added to the collection were finalized due to the fact that the criteria used to determine canonization could not exist at any time in the future. For example, for Christians a book of the New Testament must have been a book or letter written by one of the apostles or under their direction or influence, and the book must expound doctrine fully representative and in line with the Gospel as taught by the Church as learned from Jesus Christ. The book also had to have played some influence in the early churches, usually read in its liturgy alongside Old Testament books during public worship and thus considered to have been elevated to the authority of those Jewish sacred writings. Since eventually all the apostles and those who learned “at their feet” eventually passed away, the time eventually came when no further books could ever meet this criteria.
While there are even other reasons why one can’t any longer legitimately suggest that the Bible is missing books from its canon, the above should suffice due to limits on time and space here.*
As to unfinished books, it has been suggested by some Biblical scholars that the Gospel of Mark may have been unfinished as the oldest manuscripts surviving manuscripts of the book has it ending abruptly with the words “they were afraid” found at Mark 16:8. The current endings found today in Mark were added by either a student of the author or somonee else who was inspired to do so prior to the final canonization by Church authorities.
The Acts of the Apostles is generally viewed to be completed, but there is still a slight chance that its abrupt ending could be indicative of the writer having been prematurely halted by some outside influences. And the Gospel of John seems to have two endings, with the original author’s work ending at John 20:31 and what appears to be an addition to the Gospel with the following chapter (21). The reason for this addition has been suggested by scholars that while the added information still had the original author as its source, for some unforeseen reason it had no been added and thus had to be added on by one of John’s disciples or even a second generation follower prior to the final canonization.
*–There is a slight difference among Catholic/Orthodox Christians and Protestants in regards to a handful of books that are found in Catholic editions of the Old Testament, but not in Protestant editions. The Catholic Church accepted as canon those Jewish books generally found in the Alexandrian Septuagint (LXX) canon of the Old Testament since this was the version of Old Testament Scripture used by Christians from apostolic times. Protestants accept the Old Testament canon that Jewish leaders of the Synod of Jamnia accepted in 90 AD which rejects some of the books of the Alexandrian LXX canon.
Fully grasp a lot better?
Leave the actual answer within a comments!
No comments:
Post a Comment